Moonraker shirley bassey Of

Moonraker shirley bassey

Of course, you could just accept the zombies dont kill other zombies unless theyre hoarding all the food concept, but for some reason, that seems to baffle a lot of you. Sending all the wrong mental images to all the right minds. This movie was set in a time I know and it wasnt advertised as a zombie flick. It is a what if flick. What? Are you kidding? It was advertised as Danny Boyle re-invents zombie horror. Saying 28 Days Later wasnt advertised as a zombie movie is like saying Star Wars wasnt marketed as science fiction. Location: Plattsburgh, NY I thought it was a pretty good movie. I was wondering, though, how they did the shots of downtown London without anyone in them. I could understand a shot of the skyscrapers without lights. that could be done by computer graphics or models correct me if thats not how they did it, but how did they do the scenes where he is walking around downtown without anyone around and also with the added props like the trashed bus and other assorted post-riot trash. I posted in the other thread but dropped it moonraker shirley bassey people were getting a wee bit defensive over the movie. I enjoyed the movie and thought it was well done to a point but do agree that it had serious problems. In the end, these problems can be overlooked and dont really detract too much from the movie. What I dont get are the people who feel the need to invent out of movie explanations for everything. The movie had plot holes, deal. Just send me to hell or New York City, it would be about the same to me Hank Williams Jr Im sure that some of the points being made about inconsistencies are on the mark. But screw that; i thought the movie was fantastic, and nothings gonna change my mind. God was my co-pilot, but we crashed in the Andes and i had to eat him. Location: Dublin, Ireland I thought it was a pretty good movie. I was wondering, though, how they did the shots of downtown London without anyone in them. I could understand a shot of the skyscrapers without lights. that could be done by computer graphics or models correct me if thats not how they did it, but how did they do the scenes where he is walking around downtown without anyone around and also with the added props like the trashed bus and other assorted post-riot trash. They did it by filming very early in the morning. You will notice the the sun is quite loq in the scenes. The held the traffic and people back. They had quite a problem with drunk clubbers IIRC. They also did it quick. One of two attempts and that was it. Some of the scenes also had the cars and people digitally removed from the background. I really liked the film. Yeah it has plot holes but so what. I looked at it with my sister who is a jumpy screamy wagon when looking at these types of movies. The movie freaked her out. Her reactions and the movie freaked me out. I looked at it to get a bit freaked out and it worked. What? Come on! That woman was so stupid! What rational person would book into a hotel in the middle of nowhere with a creepy clerk who seems to have some abnormal relationship with his mother, and then take a shower? Hasnt she seen any movies? I think what attracts the kind of nit-picking I did to the movie is that the really major flaws werent with aspects of the film like, how long could the infected survive, or why didnt they attack each other, or why werent there any radio/satellite broadcasts. When you go to see a horror movie, or science fiction or fantasy, you start with a blanket suspension of disbelief on the physics of the movie that moonraker shirley bassey it what it is, whether thats undead monsters, warp drives or dragons. But then you expect the characters to live by the internal logic the movie establishes.